Leaderboard

Wish the sarcasm tags were still here... But yes, I agree with it being too cheap. Although if it was any more expensive I probably wouldn't be able to go to theme parks as often.

Using that logic, Sea World doesn't need any food or beverage locations since Movie World has it covered. They should get rid of all toilet facilities too, since Dreamworld has some around their park.

On a related note they were thinking of renaming the others Toyota, Nissan and Ssang Yong.. The correct name is Kai.

No one is saying that Seaworld doesn't need 2 or 3 quality flats. I agree wholeheartedly with this. However, a ride as iconic as Corkscrew NEEDS to be replaced with a coaster that will similarly become as famous as its predecessor. This ultimately means a coaster of some form. What that form may take is open to speculation, but the fact is that Seaworld needs to find a suitable replacement for its most enduring ride. The point is that Corkscrew helped make Seaworld what it is today. It would be a miscalculation if the powers that be did not install a coaster to fill the skyline in the same way that Corkscrew did successfully for 32 years Now if within this footprint room for 2 quality flat rides can be found, then this will be a win win situation. I personally would love to see an Intamin Megalite or something similar from Mack go here. As I stated before, the removal of Corkscrew has freed up a large tract land. Seaworld has not had this much land to work with since Jet Rescue was installed. Lets hope they make some very calculated decisions regarding the best use of this space as it will impact the park for years to come. I am definitely hoping that sanity prevails and a coaster is the choice,

Don't even know why I bother, but can I just explain that if you've signed a contract saying you can't say, then leading people to the answer and then basically telling them they're right is still violating the contract! not very smart sir