Jump to content

New display name

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,606

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    219

 Content Type 

Everything posted by New display name

  1. New display name
    Thank you very much but II never said DW fudged anything and never implied it.
  2. New display name
    @BaconjackWhat adds to the mix is after the accident DW claimed to thoroughly inspect every ride before re-opening them. I wonder if the inspections were completed to the major inspection standard, or to DW's standard. 🤷‍♀️
  3. New display name
    @Levram__you didn't answer my question.
  4. New display name
    From my understanding, just because the Claw is 20 years old does not mean it is due for its second 10 yearly inspection. The legislative requirement asks for 10-year inspections from last major inspection, from the Code of practice 2023. (an engineer can also override the interval between inspection) The new legislative requirements were written because of the accident at DW. When was the last major inspection?
  5. New display name
    Don't you think, marketing a new major ride, before opening up what you have just spent 50m on, a bit backwards? @Brad2912 I've put off trips, to wait for a new ride to open.
  6. New display name
    @Coppertinethe trademark application went up last week.
  7. New display name
    I wouldn't say no to a TOT 3.
  8. New display name
    I will be extremely upset if DW are replacing the Claw. I wanted the Claw footprint, to be turned into more shaded seating.
  9. New display name
  10. New display name
    You don't? I haven't read the rulebook.
  11. New display name
    You could call it a soft opening. It's probably better to train people to operate slides, when people are going down the slides.
  12. New display name
    WWW could have hired the new staff already but are still training them. It you're hiring new staff each year, you don't have many experienced people to do the training.
  13. New display name
    Free coffee cups, you get with every ride purchase? Trident is the only ride purchased to save money, but the mistake is, that ride isn't suited for its location. I don't believe Huss isn't a cheap version of a Topspin and maybe SW had just got a dud one. Leviathan, you don't buy a wooden coaster to save money.
  14. New display name
    Do parks intentionally, order nonfunctional or unreliable rides to safe money?
  15. New display name
    We all read what you said @ShakeShack
  16. New display name
    You wanted the ride hardware to be beautiful?
  17. New display name
    DW tried to save money in the most important stage of the project, and it shows. @Tricoart
  18. New display name
    Construction at MW stared well before Jungle Rush, so want you are saying is trash.
  19. New display name
    Do you see a shed or a Temple? ⬇️
  20. New display name
    A full Temple. Which we now know isn't happening. Anything else isn't what DW promised.
  21. New display name
    MW has 3 coasters to commission, where DW has one. It's a no brainer, MW requires more time to get 3 coasters up to speed. It was always on the cards MW's testing would start before DW.
  22. New display name
    Good one @ShakeShack /s
  23. New display name
    It makes no sense. SW put fake greenery past the shed. It's like they had the stuff, but they didn't know where to stick it.
  24. New display name
    It's all good people, I've ordered a new hat for when I visit DW.
  25. New display name
    That's good @Tricoart. I want the shed not to bother me. But now, all I see is shed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

  I accept