Search the Community

It looks like Gumbya World is about to announce something, maybe a new ride

Just came across a post from PicoPlay talking about their work with Gumbuya World. They described being commissioned to create a 10 year masterplan for the park including talks of a resort. It included some loose concept art as seen below. I can’t exactly make out too much from the image but maybe others have a better idea.

I recently got a chance to visit both Funfields and Gumbuya World in Victoria. This was my first time to both parks, so here are my overall thoughts and experiences during my visits. Funfields A 50 minute drive north of Melbourne, I arrived at the park around 9:45 for a 10am opening. The weather wasn't looking to great at arrival, so it was a very quiet start to the day. Not knowing much about the park (except for photos of new attractions that have opened in recent years), we started with a lap around the whole park to get a feel for it's layout and it's offerings. I was with two others who regularly visit the park, so it was cool to get a guided tour from someone who knows the park well. Walking through the Mystic Kingdom, it looked like a solid kids area, with a good variety of attractions. The two water play structures were reasonable, but I definitely think the park would benefit from having a structure like the one at WWW, but with the addition the WnW Jnr slides (more on what I think this park should add later). We then walked past Typhoon and the older slides of the park, before heading over to the more recent additions of the park. This 'Proslide Precinct' has been executed very well, particularly with the addition of the wave pool. We used the lockers at the back of the park and the seats by Volcano Beach before taking on the first slides. First slide of the day was Gravity Wave, as there was three of us, currently you can only have either two or four people ride. Even with two people though, what a fantastic slide this is. I haven't ever ridden a slide like this before (Kamikaze is probably the closest, but not really) and these are such a great slide. We did a couple rides on this as a group of two, but we found a single rider so we could do a ride with four. WOW. Four people on this just made the experience even more thrilling. And overall the attraction has such great pace, not a dull moment. Spoiler alert, this was my favourite attraction in the park. One of the GC water parks should absolutely get one of these. Next was Supernova, their newest attraction. While not entirely the traditional tornado slide, it very much had a similar experience. However, comparing to WWW and WnW this was definitely the better version. The flying saucer component, visually looks cool, but doesn't really add much to the overall experience. But overall the pacing of the slide, speed and drop into the funnel were a lot of fun. Next was Typhoon, which is very similar to the Little Rippers at WWW, but a much longer experience. I always enjoy the Little Rippers, so this version was even more enjoyable because of the extra length at the start before the drop into the bowl. We then did Wipeout & Blackout, these were more standard tunnel slides that you can ride as a single or double. Blackout was definitely my favourite of the two, purely because it was actually pitch black (not like Blackhole at WnW, but the former Terror Canyon's... total darkness). The remaining slides weren't opening until later in the day due to the lower crowd levels, so we walked around the remaining areas of the park. I was surprised to see so much area was dedicated to grass/picnic areas, but apparently that is a massive selling point for the park as you can bring your own food, have BBQs, etc in this corner of the park. The whole area looked to be really looked after and was so nice to see a park to offer something like this. The weather was turning for the better and it ended up being a beautiful day, which meant the crowds did start to increase. We went into the wave pool, which has also been nicely executed. It's not a massive wave pool and the volcano at the deep end could've been better to hide some of the trees behind (it just felt out of scale). We then went on the Kraken Racer and this was definitely the surprise of the day. The BRO at WWW is much bigger, but the speed you pickup in the tunnel on Kraken is insane. I went on the outer slide first, but the second go I did the inner slide and that was even more insane. Dare I say you even get the sensation of airtime coming out of the tunnel. I think this could be the best racer in the country (The only one that might beat it is the Octo Racer at Jamberoo, but I'm yet to ride that one). We then did the Splashdown slides, which are the oldschool sitdown mat slides; these are fine, but wouldn't be missed if replaced. We then did a few more rides on Gravity Wave & Supernova and then ended the day on the Toboggan. This was the first ever toboggan I'd done and they're definitley a lot of fun. Overall, Funfields is a fantastic park. It is very well looked after, all the staff were great, loading was efficient, the food offerings were very good value & quality (better than any of the GC parks). Their overall attraction lineup is really good and with another slide tower with a couple more sldies, that will really complete the park (and there is surprisingly a more land behind Gravity/Supernova for plenty more future expansions). I thing I haven't yet mentioned, but worth noting... the stairs to access the slides are very wide and comfortable to climb; they have really cared for the guest experience! And on my point earlier about building a larger kids splash area, I think the removal Bumpa Boats and utilising that land for some of the KIDZ ProSlide attraction would suit the park very well. With the go-karts set to close and the addition of a lazy river, that will be a great asset for the park and I look forward to seeing how they theme/landscape it. Funfields is definitely a park I would head back to and I can't wait to see what they have planned for the future. Gumbuya World An hours drive west of Melbourne, I arrived at Gumbuya World at around 11am on what was a very wet and cold Melbourne day. The entrance to the park is really nicely done and so is the walkway leading to the point where the park separates into its four lands. Again, not knowing much about the park (other than it's two coasters), I walked around the park getting a feel for it's layout. Being a much newer park than Funfields, it's overall masterplan is very beneficial to it's layout and arrangement of attractions. To start the day, we had to do the coasters. First was TNT, which was quite the surprise. Overall, it has been very well executed, with a cohesive and developed theme that is clear throughout the whole ride experience. The audio really adds to the experience and the little pieces of theming scattered (but well considered) throughout the on-ride experience is really well done. It actually surprised me how good it was. I'd say it's the third best themed coaster in the country (behind Leviathan because of it's queue and station and then Superman for it's pre-launch experience (Scooby would beat TNT, but Village ruined that ride)). And the coaster itself was such a great surprise. It's just a good fun coaster and depending on where you sit, it can be thrilling too. It's super smooth and the trains are super comfy (I hope Kenny's Forest Flyer can benefit from them one day). We ended up riding it about 8 times throughout the day in a variety of rows, but back seat was definitely the best! Next was Project Zero, the reincarnation of BuzzSaw. For me, this was always a one and done at DW and as expected, I still feel the same way. The ride has definitely had a lot of work done to it to bring it back to life, so kudos to the park for investing in it properly. The ride experience was much better than the last few years it had at DW, but it still wasn’t the smoothest ride. It’s nicely presented, but isn’t anywhere near to the level that TNT is at. We then walked around the rest of the park it see its offerings. There are quite a few flat rides on offer, but none were a stand out, except for Rebel (but not in a good way). That rides got to go. It’s very loud, obnoxious and kind of ruins the overall park experience when it’s operating. All the other flat rides, while fixed to the ground, feel temporary. They all look like retired carnival rides that they got for cheap to just build up the parks lineup. The animal area of the land was pretty impressive in its scale. There was a lot more to it than I expected and it’s been nicely put together. Despite the rain, we gave all of the water attractions a go. Unlike Funfields, the four attractions share the tower, but there’s only two queue lines between the four. So up end with the issue that WWW had with Green Room and Wedgie. Thankfully, due to the rain, we didn’t actually have this issue, but I can imagine on a nice day, the queue would be a nightmare. And the staff definitely weren’t as efficient as Funfields, so even a small queue took longer than it probably should have. Out of the four slides, the only notable one was the Boomerang, which was a less superior version of Gravity Wave. All the other slides were one and done for me (even if it was a nice day). The wave pool was much bigger than Funfields and is comparable to WnWs in its scale and large screen at the deep end. There was also a lazy river that went around (almost) the entire waterpark. This was very nicely done and one part had rapids which were enjoyable. After this, we did a few more goes on TNT and that was the day done. The food wasn’t outstanding, just standard theme park food and quality. One thing I noticed was that almost all the seating in the waterpark you had to pay for. There was the standard cabanas, but there was been wave pool seating that you had to pay for. There was some free, but it was very limited. I imagine in the summer, that park sucks a lot of money out of people because of the up charges. Something that I thought it was lacking was just overall attractions. Yes they had more than Funfields, but most of what they had wasn’t great quality in my opinion. TNT makes Gumbuya worthwhile for me, but they definitely need more water slides and a decent amount of flat rides that feel permanent. FINAL OPINIONS Overall, I had an enjoyable time at both parks and it was great to finally visit parks outside the Gold Coast to see how others run a theme park. For me, Funfields was definitely a standout. They had a great quality of attractions, good variety, the park was very clean, friendly and had quality. Gumbuya World was enjoyable, and I’m still blown away by how good TNT was. They did a fantastic job with that ride and I can’t wait to see what Movie World do with their version, because Gumbuya have set the bar high. For me, it’s the best family coaster in the country (Village can’t convince me that Leviathan is a family coaster) and if they keep it up with that standard, they have the potential to be a great park. They just need more. And I would definitely recommend checking them both out if you’re in Melbourne. My final score based off my first visit to both parks would be an 8.5/10 for Funfields and a 6.5/10 for Gumbuya.

Time to do another "big" poll, this time with one of the most popular ride types in the country. Vote by Sunday.

Thought I would start this up for fun. Each Saturday I list two rides from two different parks, and people vote what is best. Voting will close on Thursdays, and on Fridays the results are revealed. One ride is saved and one is turned into paperclips. For example, it could be Superman Escape v Steel Taipan one week. If ST wins it would be added to the list while Superman would be removed. Clones will be counted as one choice, not two. Also you do not need to have ridden the coaster to vote, but it would be good if you have. Let's start off with... TNT (Gumbuya World) vs. Kenny's Forest Flier (Dreamworld) In my opinion I would pick TNT. It is actually really fun and intense for a family coaster and I am glad Movie World is getting a clone. Also it goes fast the whole length of the ride while KFF seems to go slow in the second half. Remember to put results in by Thursday.

We will be comparing two moderate sized family coasters today, which are Sapphire Speed Coaster vs. Mining Race Coaster at Magic Mountain Merimbula and Gumbuya World respectively. Vote by Sunday, and thanks to @Gazzafor the idea.

Time to go back to basics: We will be voting either Green Lantern or Project Zero this time. Remember to put your vote in by Friday.

Today is the day Victorian theme parks change forever. TNT and Project Zero officially open. This is the place to share your thoughts, comments, feedback and photos of the new coasters at Gumbuya World.

So something I’ve noticed lately on various theme park podcasts and discussion groups is talk about the difference between regional “action/amusement parks” and theme parks. One notable example is a recent podcast episode I listened to that spoke about Gumbuya World’s new coasters. The hosts claimed that “Gumbuya has transcended it’s action park status and is now a proper theme park” with the addition of these two new attractions. I disagree with this statement. In my view, Gumbuya has always been a well themed park with dedicated “lands” and areas just as any legitimate theme park would and I’ve always classified it as such. I don’t think simply adding one type of ride should suddenly change the entire category the park is labeled under. Meanwhile, I’ve also seen other people claim that Gumbuya needs at least 4 or 5 more major attractions before it can be classed as a true theme park. So that’s got me thinking, what truly makes a “theme park” a proper theme park and at what point does a park like Gumbuya cross-over to become universally regarded as a theme park instead of a simple action park? Is it when a certain level of theming is installed? When a certain amount of rides and attractions are brought in? Does it matter what kinds of attractions the park has? Does layout have anything to do with it? There are parks like Adventure World and Funfields which have fantastic theming and story telling in their rides and tick a lot of the “theme park” boxes for me, yet I’m sure many still see them as action/amusement parks. At the same time, there are other parks that have coasters and big attractions but are widely regarded as simple amusement parks. To give my opinion, I see parks like Adventure World, Adventure Park, Funfields, Gumbuya World, Aussie World, Magic Mountain and Jamberoo as a unique “Australian style” of theme park (similar to how Europe and the US have distinctive styles of theme parks) as let’s face it, it’s what the majority of our parks are like and isn’t really replicated the same way anywhere else (particularly the wide open spaces and mashup of dry rides and water rides sharing the same space). I’m interested to hear your thoughts and opinions on this matter.

This was just mentioned on the radio over 100 people in the group coming.

I was just looking at Gumbuya Worlds website and saw that they have redone it to include photos and information on each individual attraction and noticed that on one of the pictures on the Oasis springs page said this. Any thoughts and what at do you guys think the slide should?