Everything posted by Jobe
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
Yeah I dont think that would be the major cause of concern , to be honest. The steel Big Dipper only ever had noise complaints leveled against it , not obstruction issues. A new coaster would have to be extremely high to attract that sort of complaint and I think the management of LPS are smart enough to not do that. The previous Big Dipper was 131 feet high and I could be wrong, but I dont think we will see another coaster be installed at this height or exceed it. Also LPS now has a working height limit envelope to work to - if attractions do not exceed this height limit then they do not attract a complying DA process to go through. Theoretically , they still could build a ride with the height of the previous Big Dipper but i think that the will of LPS to do so is not overly strong.
-
Scenic World/ Orphan Rocker Exploration Video
Hi guys- happy Sunday!! Just perusing Youtube and saw this excellent video on Scenic World and of particular interest to me, the never opened Orphan Rocker. The poster does a good job of giving a great over view of the entire ride as it currently stands and does a bit of urban exploration around the site. In this we see: The resting place of the previous Scenic Railway ( replaced by the current one in early 2013) The resting place of the 2nd Scenic Skyway ( replaced in 2017) He walks quite a good part of the existing Orphan Rocker track and we also get to see the trains up close, which is very interesting. He also explores a disused path ( in thongs!!!!!!!đ˛- make that of what you will ) to the nearby Orphan Rock feature to which access has been closed to since the '50's He also gets some great footage of the Scenic Railway as it journeys down near the Orphan Rock formation. We all know that the Orphan Rocker has never opened and this video really puts the final nail in the coffin to the question COULD it ever open. Sadly, with subsequent additions to the Scenic Railway and the Skyway, the loading station for the ride has since been removed as has also several pieces of track along the course. This ride will forever go down in Australian amusement park history and indeed the world as one of the biggest "what if's" that never reached fruition. Scenic World appear quite content to leave whats remaining of Orphan Rocker to slowly decay and fall apart , which is of course a massive shame. I do remember seeing an interview article with Anthea Hammon , the current Managing Director of Scenic World ( and daughter of Scenic World founder , Phillip Hammon) where she explains that the the Orphan Rocker "just doesnt fit in with the current direction of Scenic World" . Any hopes for any revival of this ride in its current form or even a new refurbished form are virtually nil. Here is the second video posted by Gareth that focuses on Scenic World and its other attractions- its also good viewing. Here is also the link to the most current article on the Orphan Rocker from the Daily Telegraph in January 2019. ( Beware, you may be hit by a paywall here ) https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/scenic-world-md-anthea-hammon-reveals-what-happened-to-the-orphan-rocker-roller-coaster/news-story/40ddd7cf1b0e8570830ab6e67315cec8 In case you cannot see it, I have posted it below for all. The article does have some quite excellent rare pics of the ride in operation and with passengers on board. Scenic World MD Anthea Hammon reveals what happened to the Orphan Rocker roller coaster Nicole Hogan, The Daily Telegraph January 23, 2019 10:21am IT has been the centre of conspiracy theories, rumour and curiosity for over 30 years. The Orphan Rocker at Scenic World in the Blue Mountains was dubbed âthe worldâs scariest rollercoasterâ by enthusiasts and âdangerousâ by online theme park forums. It started in the 1980s as a passion project for Scenic World owner Harry Hammon and his son Phil. In 1985, Harry told the media, âItâs a frightening ride ... it really will be bit of a horrorâ. The Orphan Rocker at Scenic World in the Blue Mountains The 840-metre steel coaster was anticipated to be the first of its kind â an Australian-made and manufactured thrill ride â with carriages like coal mine carts, darting through the forest, plunging down tunnels and towering 200-metres above the rainforest floor. Over time, theories would surface grasping to explain delays in the ride opening. Some would say the coaster was unsafe, claiming sand-filled test dummies were hurled from carriages zipping around cliffhanging bends. Others reported locals didnât want the noise associated with a thrill ride; others would hypothesise the ride was built incorrectly, by unqualified engineers, and some speculated it was the local council who wouldnât approve it. The Rocker was the brainchild of Phil Hammon âWe donât generally comment on the Orphan Rocker,â says Anthea Hammon, the third generation family member to manage the major tourist attraction. âTo be honest, it is what it is. I am happy to grow and evolve Scenic World and the Rocker didnât fit with what we were doing. So, I wasnât particularly heartbroken by it.â Which is surprising as Ms Hammon admits she was so enthralled by roller coasters as a youngster, she wrote to American theme parks to ascertain how to build them. The 840-metre steel coaster was anticipated to be the first of its kind âI just loved roller coasters,â says Ms Hammon. âI went to all the ones in Queensland and there was one at Wonderland in the 1980s. I first went on one when I was about eight, we went to Expo 88, and thatâs what really started it for me. âI went on the really cool suspended coaster they had, I can still vividly remember it because it made such an imprint on me. âDuring high school I wrote to a few roller coaster companies in America and asked âWhat sort of engineers do you employ? Because thatâs what I want to beâ and that is what drove me to study mechanical engineering.â The Orphan Rocker had rocking carriages like coal mine carts Ms Hammon adds that the demise of the Orphan Rocker and the incessant conspiracies clouding it are tedious. âHonestly, it is a pretty boring reason why it didnât open, and that is, we had so many visitors that my father needed to dedicate his time to building the cableway and creating different attractions for the site. âI think when there is a really boring story people fill the void with something that is more interesting. Darting through the forest âWe were pushing a million visitors a year off the back of a wave of Japanese visitors in the early 90s and Dad knew the sort of attraction they wanted, which was another cable car and to get better access into the back of the valley. âHe spent six years, more than six years developing that, so by the time he planned it, got that through council, got it built and opened it in 2000, he had to dedicate all his time to that. âWhen you are in business, you need to build a business strategy that is going to support the market that you are delivering your product to,â says Ms Hammon. Plunging down tunnels While not heartbroken the Rocker never officially opened, Ms Hammon says her obsession with roller-coasters has transformed into something else. âYes I have a fascination with roller coasters, but equally now I have a fascination with cable cars. I want to go to Switzerland one day to work on cable cars over there,â says Ms Hammon. âI think the roller coaster obsession was a teenage thing that I moved past. I love rides now, but itâs not a fascination I have anymore. Towering 200-metres above the rainforest floor âI am really happy to see the way Scenic World has evolved to where it is and building the new train was just an amazing experience and is probably better than any rollercoaster we put in because it is our hero product.â Hammon adds, âWhatever we build at Scenic World needs to fit with our customers and what they are telling us they want, and the demographic of the people we have visiting â which is why we just upgraded the Skyway â putting 30 per cent more capacity in that because thatâs what people want to go on. Parts of the abandoned rollercoaster remain in place at the site. Picture: Facebook Engaging visitors is a high priority and Ms Hammon has an intuitive vision of what Scenic World is, and what it isnât. âWe are a funny mix of an attraction â we are not an amusement park, we are not a theme park, but we arenât just a board walk, we are not rides, but we are a bit history, we kind of fit into quite a few boxes â which gives you that authentic mountain experience,â says Hammon. âWe are not trying to be a theme park, it doesnât fit the environment that you are in â theme parks are normally in a created space, whereas we have a natural environment â this beautiful backdrop to work with makes it much easier to provide that authentic experience â rather than saying âhere is the environment!â and ramming that down peopleâs throats.â Today some parts of the structure are still visible, overgrown with vegetation, discoloured and lying abandoned. âI WAS EIGHT WHEN I TOLD STAFF I WOULD RUN THE PLACEâ Growing up in a natural wonderland definitely had its perks for Anthea Hammon, but how does a girl grow up to run one of NSWâs most successful tourist attractions? âMy dad used to work six days a week, Sunday through to Friday and I had the great joy of coming to work with him most Sundays, from about the age of five, until I moved away for university. âInitially when I small I would follow him around and do everything he did and thatâs where I got my love of engineering from, following him around when he was working on rides or pinball machines or maintaining the boilers. Managing Director of Scenic World Anthea Hammon sits on the remains of the Orphan Rocker. Picture: Adam Taylor âI have four siblings, but none of them really did that as much as I did. That was my time with dad, as well as the seed for my love of all things engineering. âOld staff members have told me when I was eight years old I used to yell from the platforms that I was going to run this place one day,â says Ms Hammon laughing, âBut I grew out of that, I think as a little kid you always want to do what your parents do, yet I always wanted to be an engineer. âI decided I wanted to build roller coasters, so most of my high school years were driven by that. I did all those types of subjects to achieve it. I did my thesis on things up here at work and that meant being involved back in the business. Theories surfaced grasping to explain the rides demise âAt that time, after a break going to Sydney for university. I thought I want to come back. We were doing a lot of redevelopment at the time, we were rebuilding the Skyway in 2003 â we have just rebuilt it again â so that really got me interested. I thought âI donât want to go and work in a car factoryâ, I would really love to come and work here and at that point in time dad needed help, so I stepped into the business.â Ms Hammon says the family ties to the business are deeply entrenched. âMy grandfather was working in the business until he was about 90 and my great aunt, used to work in the ticket box. âWe would go out walking our my mum on weekends, and weâd walk down the Furber Stairs and catch the train back up, but my aunt wouldnât let us out of the train without a kiss on the cheek â that was the ticket price for the ride. I have really beautiful memories of growing up within the family business. Some said the coaster was unsafe, claiming sand-filled test dummies were hurled from the carriages âMy brother worked here as well, as joint managing director for five years. He has an economics and commerce background, so he and I had this excellent complementary set of skills set that when we started running the business together â me with engineering and him with the finance side of it â was brilliant when we were undertaking $30 million dollars of investment in the new scenic railway.â efties make about as much sense as a gooseâs fart Ms Hammon explains this was very much a legacy left to her by her Dad, Phil. âWhen I started, dad was already undertaking the redevelopment of the Skyway â he had rebuilt the main building â I came in and took a load off his hands managing the maintenance team and organising all the maintenance for the new rides. Initially I was more of a project engineer and over time took on more.â Anthea and Phil Hammon The constant cycle of upgrading and reinventing the attractions cemented Ms Hammonâs future in the business. âWith the new train in 2013, it just got to the point where like every 20 years we have to refresh the rides because thatâs the design life. It was like we have the choice of either buying a new gear box and motor, or building something new, something thatâs really going to engage with our customers and be what the next generation of customers expect. âWe put in the changeable seats with the cliffhanger and laid-back options and created a bit of interactivity, which is what the customers are really telling us they want. âWas it daunting? Sure, it is always daunting. Rebuilding your main attraction and we had negative feedback from people saying âhow dare you change the ride, we loved the old trainâ and I agree the old train had its glamour, but it had its challenges and unfortunately with things like this you have to move with the times and keep upgrading.â Scenic World attracts millions of visitors a year SUPPORTING THE LOCAL COMMUNITY As a way of formalising the Hammonâs generosity in supporting the Blue Mountains community, the family recently launched a new program, sharing what they do with locals. âLast year we launched the share program â a philanthropic program where we give three per cent of our profits back to the community,â says Ms Hammon. â We have partnered with the Blue Mountains World Heritage Institute, Schools Plus, the Foundation for Rural and Original Renewal and Western Sydney University, to help education at all levels. Scenic World is home to worldâs steepest railway âItâs really about building within our community, better skills, and better school finishing rates so that we can create more skilled people who then contribute back to our community up here. âThis all links back to those family values of getting people to work and live in the Mountains and be part of the community." So that appears to be the final word on Orphan Rocker- RIP. It would have been an absolutely AMAZING ride if it had opened and it would have attracted hundreds of coaster enthusiasts from around the world to come and ride. What a shame that it is nothing now but a case of what could have been and consigned to being just a footnote in our amusement park history.
-
Dreamworld CEO talks thrill ride replacements off the back of Ardent Leisure cash injection
Yeah easily, if not more. But if there is a plan for one , then at least there is some consideration by Ardent to still be in the game with Dreamworld for the mid term at least. If this occurs, then its a massive injection for the future of the park. However, for that to occur , they need to start planning that NOW . Lets hope that the scale of vision that we all hope can fix Dreamworld's woes can also be realised by Dreamworld's current management. As Slick says, cautiously optimistic, but there are a number of hoops to jump and walls to climb before we can breathe a bit easier for the future of the park.
-
Dreamworld CEO talks thrill ride replacements off the back of Ardent Leisure cash injection
Yeah Slick I agree 100% here. The cash injection ( fingers crossed it actually occurs) is the first sign that Dreamworld actually are starting to develop some sort of plan to restore the park somewhat to its former glory. With the eventual opening of Sky Voyager , which should garner some more positive press for the park and renewed interest from the public, the park looks like it may be edging closer to turning a corner. However , that corner is QUITE large. Lets see how things develop, see what occurs, how the money is spent and what actually is purchased in the form of new rides ( and the obverse of that of course, seeing what effect that other rides removal will have- RE Wipeout). As has been stated before, Dreamworld need to hit hard now with a bang and that bang should be in the form of a new large coaster.
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
Couple of quick updates- today marks 15 years that Luna Park Sydney reopened in 2004 after having Big Dipper removed and a very doubtful future. 15 years is a great achievement and has gone very quickly. Now we are in 2019 and we have seen the start of a ride reinvestment program that should see the park grow and update to be bigger and better than ever! With the success of Volare, we are all excited to see what the next 5 years brings for LPS. Its great to see a historical amusement park like LPS not only survive but now begin to thrive! From all of us here at Parkz, we all share in the celebration of this achievement and hope for continued success for the park! The next update is a little older in scope but it has not been mentioned before on the boards. Belated congratulations to LPS for winning an award at the Exhibition and Event Association of Australasia for Best New Initiative Large Scale Venue. This award celebrates the hard work and excellence that LPS brings to their functions and venues and it remains a highly sought after venue location. It also highlights the importance that the Big Top, Crystal Palace and Lavender Green outdoor event space is to the overall continuing successful operations at Luna Park Sydney. Its this successful reinvention to a historical amusement park and mixed multi purpose function/venue centre that has been integral to LPS firstly weathering the storm of resident and noise disputes and now thriving over the last 15 years!! Great job!
-
Sky Voyager Discussion
@Brad123 thanks for your post. It was a balanced and well thought out response. I certainly agree in principle with what you have stated, in an overarching sense. i guess what it does come down to is interpretation. As you say, itâs very easy to misdiagnose intent on a public forum at times. i guess by talking about these key issues and how some people perceive how and why things are posted , we can all be better educated and I suppose better armed at dealing with these instances as they arise. If it helps in clearing up any misunderstandings and preventing these from occurring then this is the positive impact that I mentioned. Also,, just to be clear, in what I was referring to was not meant to highlight JUST Push, Skeeta or Alex, nor paint them in the light as being the only recipients or antagonists of these issues. There were certainly examples involving them but it was not meant to limit nor target these 3 posters as being the root cause. It is also not meant to reduce the numerous positive contributions that all 3 have made on the board either., which in my mind , far out weigh any perceived negatives I realise this is a sensitive topic and only through civil discourse and debate can we clear the waters and find the common ground we all seek. Cheers for that- I think there has definitely been enough said about this topic and I am certain we can all move on to what we come here to do- to indulge in the passion and love that is theme and amusement parks in general. đ
-
Sky Voyager Discussion
Skeeta this isnt about anyone who loses a debate. I understand that what you first posted was meant to be a joke and in all honesty I get that. However, Push obviously was a little offended by it and then responded. However, it was when AlexB posted AFTER that, with the very post that WAS removed ( ostensibly by the mods ) was when , for me , the line was crossed. You have to ask yourself- why was that particular post removed when the others remained? All you can draw from it was that it was offensive and went against the Community guidelines. Now this is not just about Push but lets use him as an example. Is this the FIRST instance of where posts have been pointed and directed at him in a demeaning way? Have there been comments made within posts that have been said in a derogatory tone in reference to him? The answer is obviously no as we have all seen posts as I have described that I would say falls under these banners. I am happy to have a joke- don't get me wrong. I have been on these boards for longer than most and I have seen a lot of instances and posts where the community guidelines are nowhere near followed . I come here for my enjoyment and for fun, to indulge in a love of mine- one that we all share. I agree if we all lightened up about certain things the board would be far more friendlier but this goes for proponents of both sides of this debate. Tone and context is everything. You are absolutely right here Joz and they both certainly can. But at best it's a bandaid solution as you have correctly intimated later. It doesnt remove the problem. Bullying behaviour is all about having and showing power over another individual (especially in this case, a public forum) and if the subject of that bullying blocks someone , the antagonist simply moves their behaviour onto someone else. It does not change. Not a problem. Seeing that I had just read said post is the reason for it now being given. I disagree with your premise , hence the fountain. That's why the capability is there is it not? Respectfully I disagree. I dont think that this word has been thrown around willy nilly either- this is in response to instances that have happened over a great deal of time. Not just one instance. Many. Let me be clear this is NOT about someone who has JUST had a disagreement. This is about the sustained and numerous instances where someone has been villified not just for posting an opinion, but in some cases, for posting at all, and all the derision that numerous cohorts can muster with that. Also its irrelevant that you think its not bullying. If the person in question feels offended or that there is an issue, then that is the overriding context. You cant speak on behalf of how someone feels because you are not them and you are not in there situation. To post the view that no one else know's what bullying is ( except you apparently) is nothing short of sheer arrogance. The only thing diluted here is your perception of what bullying actually is, in my opinion. I have no issue with good natured ribbing or banter. Its when malicious intent and underlying tone changes banter into something else that i have issue with. Just because someone doesnt know you personally doesnt mean what you say about about them on social media or forums cannot hurt or damage them in some way. YOU may be ok and I may be ok and able to handle situations like this but guess what? We are all different and we all react differently. I agree here Skeeta. Bullying is not the same as when there is a conflict or fighting between 2 parties. I hate to go to a dictionary meaning of bullying , but it comes in many, many forms. To be a bully: Furthermore, acts of bullying can be if: Now there have been actions and posts towards other posters that can definitely fall under one or all of these banners. I have seen it and there are other posters that have recognised this , independently and on their own. We have already seen evidence that there are people who are intimidated from posting on these boards at times, because of these actions. That seems to have been ignored amidst the rest of the debate. I am not sure what you are getting at here- HOW are we harming people who really get bullied? By having the courage to call out behaviour that can sometimes appear on these boards? By pointing out through civil discussion and debate that bullying practices and techniques do and have existed on the Parkz forums? Then I guess we are all guilty as charged. It was never going to be a popular view with certain people, cliques and circles on this board. I must say, I am a little flabbergasted at the lack of affinity that can be shown on these boards at times. This is one of them. I am not advocating for either side here, nor do I think of myself as a crusader ( as you have stylised me and others) I am, however, just standing up for what I think is right, to try and enact some positive change. Please do not misunderstand me here- I understand completely that there will be arguments and people on these boards will have disagreements and differences of opinions from time to time.That's normal. As has been shown, this could be one of those times The behaviour I have described as happening, however, is completely different. If by posting this view, one person takes this on board and posts with a little more empathy , then in my mind, that will be a positive thing. I guess we will also see , after airing this view, how I will be treated now on these boards moving forward. What I do not want to see is bullying or bullying behaviour be trivialised or water downed upon detecting or identifying. My final point is that I am not the only one that has felt the growing undercurrent of tension that can inhabit certain posts that are directed at certain posters. There are several who have arrived more or less to the same viewpoint , independently ,as they have viewed certain interactions on these boards. This is not just a one person view. Its something that IS happening and has been exposed by several other people. We have certainly heard from some in this debate. How many more remain silent? I say again to all what I posted before; Don't be a prick and the board will sort itself out. Accountability for these type of posts must be taken by ALL involved.
-
Dreamworld CEO talks thrill ride replacements off the back of Ardent Leisure cash injection
Great points and very well articulated @CaptainLazerGuns. Good point @Naazon. We know better than most, how far and fast Dreamworld has fallen. Thats not to say that we want to see it close or shut its doors- for mine its the exact opposite. If we tend to focus on the negatives, for mine, its because there are so few positives in Dreamworld's current situation to balance these out. We ALL want a strong and viable Dreamworld, but most of us recognise that this is currently far from the case. We are all hoping that at some stage someone sorts out the predicament that Dreamworld is in and restores it back to its pre-eminence in the Australian theme park industry.
-
Sky Voyager Discussion
That's insulting @Skeeta You mean like inferring that someone isn't intelligent? There's an awful lot of black kettles here folks. To put things into perspective with this comment though, this was not the escalation post, this was Push's response to a previous post which he found insulting and returned salvo on. There is always a starting point and you cannot just pick bits from the middle and infer that this was the nexus point where things went south. In this case it wasn't. Lets not muddy the waters here. I am not saying this to take sides for either views, I am just weary of these sort of posts that inhabit these boards at times. They are neither needed or required. I get that there are egos and arrogance involved and your "standing" or "pecking order" on the board is displayed- however- I say this to everyone- just don't be a prick and the board will sort itself out. Accountability for these type of posts must be taken by ALL involved. Finally this: When this sort of message gets posted in the wake of this last series of posts , you then can see the size of the issue that can affect the boards. The fact that a long time reader that has not posted for , in his own words, "a while", can recognise some of the posts here and call it for what it is, despite denials or deflections from others, should ring alarm bells for all involved on the forums. This absolutely supports the view that @iwerks brought up a while ago Now I am sure that this view or opinion that I have aired will cause some outrage for a select few. Thats ok- sometimes civil discussion can cause that. What I do hope is that this does not evolve into a "running joke" with needling comments that pop up in other posts from time to time. ( As they have in the past) I think its a serious issue and one that should be taken on its merits and I feel that a growing number of contributors and posters on this board are fully recognising this. At the end of the day, we all love theme parks and the amusement industry. This is a fantastic forum and platform in which we can indulge and interact with other like minded individuals. I guess on the back of this. we all need to think a little harder ( including me) on how and what we post. This has certainly been an enlightening experience for me and I hope that it does get noticed. I would hate to think how many other potential posters or future members of the forum are holding back or intimidated from sharing because of these actions. Hopefully , we can encourage more and more people to join and let OUR community grow with out fear of the shackles that have held them back previously. Cheers guys.
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
Yeah 100% correct here @Baconjack. Although nothing has been confirmed, there is very strong evidence to suggest that LPS will be adding a Maurer Spinning Coaster at some point in the future. The consultation with Pitt and Sherry , which is confirmed on their website is as solid as it gets. Also, the previous Senior park Manager, Brad Loxely , hinted strongly to me that another coaster will be coming to LPS. This is great news and a coaster such as a spinning Maurer would be an excellent addition for the park and also an Australian first. Lets hope that now the legal issues of DA's and adding rides has been resolved , that these plans are now firmly back on track. Could the park build another large coaster? Given the new laws that have been documented in regards to adding rides, I think that they certainly could. However , the park has several points to consider in regards to height and also placement within the park, before they could do so. I think that any large coaster would be subject to a DA , as in this case , it would more than likely exceed the limitations that have been placed on this process. A better question would be"Does LPS have the will to build a new large coaster?" On this point i would most certainly say no. Given the issues that could arise from such a install and as has already been pointed out , they want to remain on good terms with their neighbors. A new 100 foot plus coaster would not be welcome, unfortunately. LPS does need another coaster and I feel that this WILL occur with the ride reinvestment program that is now currently being undertaken. One point to note is that Luna Park still hold the trademark to the name Big Dipper, so it could still be utilised on any new coaster. Given the awesome Immelmann curve that is the feature of a Maurer spinner, its easy to see how the name "Big Dipper could be used for a coaster of this type. I personally would prefer to use the name Wildcat for it, but Big Dipper works just as well. I would love to see any new coaster use the Tumblebug space- this may require some elements being built over the back end of the slab but it would mean that the Big Dipper facade would be put to far better use and for a coaster, as it was originally intended.
-
Sky Voyager Discussion
It was more directed at a post which has since been deleted /removed which obviously crossed a line. Whilst itâs intentions were an attempt at poor humour, there was certainly a nasty undercurrent contained within it that asked for another poster in no uncertain terms to remove themselves from the board,. It was directed and pointed. What does it matter if a select audience found the post amusing? The subject matter of the post deemed it offensive, I and obviously many others saw it for what it was as well and was uncomfortable with it. For mine, itâs only a joke when itâs good natured and all parties, including who it was directed at, deem it so. The minute that it becomes a joke for a select few at the expense of someone else that is constant you start to venture into the realms of bullying. Letâs call it for what it is. Constant needling. Sure sometimes things need to be called out and shot down. We all know that. This time , for mine, wasnât one of them. I usually let them slide by and scroll on by but in this instance , I thought that a comment on the so called âcomedicâ post was required.. I love and participate in jokes on the board all the time,- it has nothing to do with not enjoying a joke. However, I have been on these boards for a very long time and have observed the interactions of many posters over the years. Some definitely cross the line and some are definitely allowed to stand because of who the poster is, which is at times , a position of inequality. The fact that the post in question has since been removed speaks volumes.
-
Sky Voyager Discussion
Sorry I think most of the members of this forum are better than that. Not really necessary in my opinion. Not judging , just like many, giving my opinion. I do not usually embroil myself in these sort of posts.
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
Yeah 100% agree here guys. I am pretty certain from what I have been told that the Maloney's Corner will receive a much needed facelift with the ongoing $25 million new ride investment. If they can reproduce something on the level of their recent refurb of the Helter Skelter cafe then it bodes very well for what is to come. Thats excellent @19Michael96. Its these small attention to details that make such a difference- lets hope that they continue this with actually finishing the decorative roof on the left hand side of the Helter Skelter cafe as you pointed out a couple of pages ago. LPS are also ramping up their Easter offerings with a special school holiday Funfest. As well as the new addition of Volare , there are also 2 temporary rides in Body Rock and Auto Racer. This is great value for anyone who is anticipating visiting the park over the Easter school holidays- it should see the park be quite busy!!!
-
The Off Topic Topic
đ Exactly. It was a poor attempt at humour in the first place. It shouldnât really rate a mention but there you go.
-
The Off Topic Topic
Well you DID refer to it in this topic for humour!! Just adding to and keeping your humour alive!! đ And we only mention a tantrum when there is one.đ A sook is a bit different as we have both established. đ
-
The Off Topic Topic
Ha!! Thatâs a very good question to ask AlexB.......đ
- Adventure World MI4 - 2019
-
The Off Topic Topic
Yep having a sook is probably a perfect term for it. Ha!! Noted!! Consider it applied and fee paid. This is indeed the question of the hour. Perhaps some form of arrogance from PCL coming through? However, it possibly could have been handled a little more delicately by those at the park for what possibly could have been a more conducive outcome for all. Indeed!!!
-
The Off Topic Topic
Absolutely agree with that. Its strange that they thought they could get away with it really, considering that its not ParkChat Live's first rodeo so to speak in regards to filming in parks. We all know that any filming in any park would require some sort of permission. Puzzling, to say the least. Oh indeed. I can live with a hissy fit. As i have stated before, the video , certainly had elements of frustration ( at their own stupidity perhaps?) and definitely came across a bit huffy. However, it never reached the heights of a full blown tantrum that it had been accused of. All in all, I think we can all safely agree that this is NOT the way to successfully conduct a live theme park filming......... AND just to put this to bed and end these somantics ,YES they are 2 definitions meaning exactly the same thing. The point is the word violent was used and accepted in the definition of a tantrum. It is a very valid point, for the purposes of this discussion. Not really relevant for mine. I was commenting on the video THAT was posted. It still served the purpose of communicating to their viewers that the Gumbaya plan had gone to shit. I know. I was alerted by the same video. That's how I was alerted. lol. Presumably since you follow them, you were too.
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
I think that could work well. Very similar concept to Aussie World's Rock n Roll Rebel ( think enclosed Tango Train with said strobe effects) Yeah I would like to see Tumblebug at least be retained but I guess the future is uncertain for them all. Time will tell.
-
The Off Topic Topic
Bingo. Clinging?? That IS the very definition of a tantrum, though.......sorry you seemed to miss that point. And you had better read the definition I posted a little more closely- here let me help you , putting in bold the operative words you are looking for " âa violent demonstration of rage or frustratďťżion; a sudden burst of ill temper.â Yep. Straight AFTER. Hence the need to inform their viewers about the cancelled trip report from Gumbaya World that WAS to be their LIVE event, communicating to their viewers who were waiting for the stream. Oh their communication was genuine alright. Did it contain saltiness, disappointment and frustration? Absolutely. But for the last bloody time, a temper tantrum it wasnt .
-
Luna Park Sydney's expansion
Great pics mate- nice job!!! Yep the Volare is certainly looking to be a big hit for the park- the public are really loving it!! Great to see that the theming around the ride has been restored ( love that giant electrical plug -thanks for the pics on that @19Michael96!!) Looking forward to getting a ride on it as soon as I can. Yeah a little bit of love for them would be nice but I think like the Moon Ranger, their days at LPS are numbered. You can bet that in order to continue the $20 million ride reinvestment, these older rides are going to have to make way for the newer attractions as they come online. It would be nice to see them stay in Australia though- perhaps one of the Victorian theme parks like Funfields or Adventure Park or even Aussie World could be a potential home for these rare rides.
-
The Off Topic Topic
Will not get an argument from me there. 100% agree. Yeah......nah. At the risk of going on ad nauseum, please see my other posts on this. IF you think this is a violent sudden burst of ill temper, then I don't think you have ever been exposed to one............. Please tell me how else they were expected to communicate to their audience that their plans had turned to shit- for what ever the reason? Seems reasonable to do a video for everyone to explain, no ,matter what frustration or saltiness seeped into it..........
-
The Off Topic Topic
It really was. A small attempt at humour. đ Thought I would join the rest of the smart arsery on this board Didnât mean to offend.đ
-
The Off Topic Topic
Oh agree. No argument from me!!