webslave

I wouldn't do it, not because the experience doesn't appeal to me, but because the meals appeal to neither me nor my wife. Seafood? Yawn, pass. As for $175/head - I'd expect to pay around $100 for meals + beverages like that, so the $75 is the experience I'd guess.

I'm partial to Scooby-Doo-Over, myself.

If I had to guess I'd say he's criticising GL for the same reason that some have criticised DD - on the basis that both feel very 'controlled'.

We talked about this capitalising every word thing. You need to try a bit harder here - saying it's just habit doesn't cut it.

Top tip: did you know you don't need to start every word with a capital letter? There's a lot more to it, but I reckon if you start small by just putting a capital letter at the start of a sentence you'll be well on your way to internet glory.

I love it - a complete outcast in all facets of life, instantly reviled (twice) by people he need not know what he looks like, sounds like, has a sexual preference for, or hangs out with, but it's still everyone else that is at fault. That's what we call victim culture, folks.

I'd be thinking something like a videogame world because there's not really a lot of competition for that theme right now, but the hard part would be finding a license. Nintendo might be a nice idea, but is probably quite pricey. If you could land a Minecraft license you'd probably do pretty well - the appeal seems to be fairly broad, and the theme is also fairly open to interpretation. A bit of cross-over with Microsoft would probably do alright here, too.

I personally chalk it up to the rides not being open. I wouldn't buy a ticket to visit at the moment solely on that basis, and I have to imagine others are in the same boat.

I do recall that one, but figured there must be more of a pattern.

So now I'm curious - where does Huss's negative reputation come from? Are there any particular examples?

Actually, not as different as you may think. Structural integrity being a given for doing so it would not be entirely unexpected in such a circumstance to similarly put up temporary metal fencing and leave it as-is in the interim. Yes, if they hadn't opened people would be pissed about long lines due to two popular rides being down. No question. This is the other side of that. The solution? Don't get in that situation in the first place.

Looks to me like MW shit the bed on DD and ran over time on SDSC's work and were left with the choice to make safe and re-open or to keep it shut (particularly given it's unlikely it would have been getting worked on between Christmas and New Year, so you're not losing work days). I'm thinking if I were a regular punter I wouldn't be feeling too safe travelling through the ride given I'd imagine the quality of finish of the surrounds in areas I can see is one of the cues I'd take as to the overall quality of the park's work in areas I can't see. I understand the argument for running the ride on the basis that it's "technically functional" and you're in your busiest period of the year, but bugger me this is a new one. You wouldn't run a dark ride in a half-burned out building just because the track is clear. You wouldn't run a set of dodgem cars with their shell casings removed just because they still go. It's the wrong message to send your guests about what's important to you, and where you feel your quality standard is set.

The part that makes you consider that it could be permanent is that part you don't see in the photo - the attitude of park management (which at a guess is why Slick said what he did). You could easily take the view of "Well, everything there is pretty easily moved", but at the same time there's got to be a reason it was put there in the first place. Why bother putting something so shitty and easily moved in-place if you were planning on doing the job properly? I'd call it an each way bet.

Did the outdoor course at King Tutt's recently for the first time. I generally found it to be in poor repair. 2/5.

Alex is right. Unlike the old cliche we do in fact put a price on a human life every single day.

Absolutely. Nothing like playing the life-long victim despite causing your own shit.

No-no you guys, serzzz, Dreamworld is failinggg. It's because they are zomg mur-dilly-urdlers, amirite? Anyone? No? *pop*

I was up there a couple of weeks ago with my young son and my wife. We would not have attended Dreamworld had we been up there at the moment instead, purely on the basis that half the park is still shut. Were it open we would be attending in preference to the rest of the VRTP line-up.

It just goes to prove my theory from this post: POP returns under cover of anonymity - no baggage from the old account, and literally within a week everyone hates the new account and has worked out who it is to boot. Still not time to ask "Maybe it's me?" yet, POP?

Ugh. Here's an idea; stop clicking the 'start new topic' button.

I reckon you need to dig out an old copy of RCT or something...

Also sounds like issues that would not have simply become an issue recently, and probably passed an audit/inspection before.

Sadly it's happened before as you would well know. An operator who, albeit well-intentioned, ducks into the envelope to collect a lost personal item, for example. Another real-world example I believe was to cover speakers to protect them from rain. It would be great if we could rely solely upon training for people to do what they are meant to do, but the sad reality as you well know is that we can not.

If they are paying 0.97% on credit card transactions I'd suggest someone wants to look for a new job, given I can get a rate like that at a much lower volume...

Quite right. I had checked those out subsequently and completely understand. I guess I was moreso pointing out that the stuff not running was all very visible/front of park - Aqua Racers included.