Reanimated35

Why is it that with 2 of the 3 threads you've started you've attached a completely unrelated stupid photo?

Apology accepted. You're usually a nice enough guy anyway. I'll call off the hit. I have to completely agree with you. I think it's absolutely pathetic and disrespectful - the attitude of "I'll do what I want and too bad if you don't like it" directly the the site's owner no less. Sadly I have no authority to do anything about this and clearly the admins and Richard have a much higher tolerance level than I and they're well within their right to do so as they see fit. I do hope you reconsider your self imposed ban. And hey, if we want high res over saturated we know where to find them. And if anyone wants to have a bitch about my photos, go for it, that's what they're in the other photo threads for.

Interesting. I'm also running abp on chrome. It must be the list you subscribe to or maybe you blocked flickr in the past, but the photos display for me fine. In his defense, uploading a photo on an ADSL 2+ connection can take a good 10 minutes depending on the size and resolution. When I put a photo up on my site it takes about 10 minutes and that's just a 10-20mb photo. If they're resized on here to say 1000px on the longest side it shouldn't take any time at all. And I slightly resent you side note comment.

Without getting into a whole argument over this - 1 - I know it's not photoshopped, it just looks all jagged and edited due to the resolution 2 - 720p and 1080p are video formats, not image formats 3 - your signature doesn't comply with site rules 4 - Linking to a mobile feed of your facebook page is kind of pointless since a lot of people would be viewing it on a desktop pc and those who view it on their phones would automatically be redirected the the mobile site.

Maybe it's just the resolution, but is it just me or does it look like the middle photo, TS has been poorly photoshopped into the shot?

I never bought that lottery ticket.

However, to increase the re-ride ability of the attraction, why not use TS for that?

I can think of a couple of people on here who would agree with you.

I vote we order pizza. Gazza's shout.

Dogems are designed to be driven around and crashed into each other. JDS is not designed to be crashing into each other, however they do need to factor in that of course that will happen either via accident or deliberate manoeuvre. They're not just going to leave off a bumper because some idiot would assume they're dodgem cars, they're going to put some kind of bumper around the car to protect their investment. You do realise Dodgems don't always need the "big pole thing" right?

Oh god I was right, he is that douchebag from the Ekka. Fortunately I don't remember him from DW. I guess he's good for his target audience though which is not me....I hope.

Interesting side note - gif files upload fine but only play when you click on them. Richard/Other dude who I'm sorry but I can't remember the name of but I know you helped redesign the site, any way to have embedded gif images?

I take it to mean he wanted there to be a model of the ride where it's like the Sky Fly 12, but more of a Sky Fly 24

"Can I have all the information on new rides and attractions the parks are planning over the next few years so that I can discretely post them in an online forum? .........................please"

They're banned on rides except the rapids as far as I'm aware. I think WWW is a different story but you'd have to check with guest relations.

If you want the best of the best, you need the Hero3+ Black. It does 2K and 4K resolutions and a bunch of other stuff you probably will never use, but it's future proof for a while at least. Plus it's 12 megapixel vs 5mp on the standard (white) edition. You've got white<silver<black. But again, depends what you need and what your budget is really. Now I'm going to let you get back on topic while I go back to being 5 years behind everyone else and watch Community which I just discovered the other day is quite an awesome show.

TBH I have no idea what performers like that would make, I was only assuming it would be an entry level position paid fairly low.

It's not so much about complaining because they are trying, it's more of a shock and confusion about how it's a completely random, oddly thrown together thing. It's like someone rocked up to work one morning and went "hey you! in the business outfit, grab this megaphone and that segway and get out there". Why not just get someone out there in the Kenny costume a bit more often? Why not get a new clown? Why not get someone themed to ocean parade - say, a lifeguard, it's not hard to have someone wander around in boardshorts while carrying a life-ring or something - even better if they do a random comedy act. Then have a bushranger in gold rush etc. You'd need maybe 3 extra people. 3 people in a fulltime role, say 30k/yr and you've got a lot more entertainment and happiness for less than 100k/yr.

But rest assured it would never be good enough.

Whatever the latest is. Isn't it the GoPro 3 black or something?

^ Buy one while you're over there to avoid the Australia Tax

While yes they appear to be iphone or other phone camera shots with quite a bit of focus on DOF and a bit too much filtering for my liking, not everyone is lucky enough or inclined to want to purchase a DSLR camera.

Is it just me or does bigkev and pushbutton remind anyone else of these guys?

You know, with a couple of trees gone, they could almost fit another flat ride in that area........