auspicious

Probably more likely border closures not giving expected attendance bump?

speaking of conspiracy theorists, eh @AlexB?

Oh come on. You mentioned the loans to suggest village "owed" the premier something. That is the only reason you mentioned it so don't pretend otherwise. They got loans becuase it was commercially beneficial to QTC and qld as a whole. Still haven't seen anyone quote any statements by anyone at village that are objectively wrong or show a tantrum. I see a company fighting for their future in a heavily politicized pre election environment. Or is it just that the man with the transition lenses that a few of you decided you don't like said a naughty swear word to media? Care to elaborate? Genuinely curious what you mean by this.

Banned? Erm no they cancelled a schedule political photo op because they weren't happy with how talks with the govt were going. Thats their right as a private business just as it was their right to allow the premier to visit in the first place for some positive pr. Has nothing to do with the commercial loans they secured from the independently governed QTC. @Jdude95 grow up. The edgelord schtick isn't as cool as you think it is.

Oh good @AlexB the expert at everything speaks. Murdoch is trash. LNP offered nothing. Labor have handled covid well and won that election largely because of that handling. I have already said that. But they plucked the '28 days of no community transmission' definition of a hotspot out of no where in the months leading up to the election. Theres no WHO or legitimate scientific basis for this hardline '28 day' policy. Feel free to post links to medical/scientific materials that suggest otherwise. The curves were flattened with open borders through far more targeted and swift declarations of actual hotspots as needed months before the borders were closed. And that 'logan liar' situation you mentioned showed that community compliance with social distancing and swift contact tracing is both ncredibly effective and far more important because this virus can and does slip through the cracks. @Jdude95 yet again demonstrates his wit and intellect with his well researched rebuttal.

What actual statement by village do you disagree with though? And where are these tantrums exactly? How do you explain areas of Brisbane remaining fully open when there’s a community outbreak but areas of NSW shut off from Qld despite no cases in months? (prior to last weeks easing off border restrictions) You can’t, not from a scientific viewpoint. Because it’s been an us vs them, qld vs nsw, ALP vs LNP parochial gamble ahead of an election that paid off. I don’t even hate it and I voted for this govt to stay but I’m not going to pretend that the nsw border hasn’t been pure politics

Well it's not like Village also produce films and run cinemas.

how so? How have they chosen money over people exactly? By being vocal about an issue (borders) that is currently 100% dictated by politics and elections and 0% to do with public health or safety? Theres no logical reason that a 40,000 person grand final can go ahead but Sydney remains shut off because of a tiny handful of isolated cases. Its all election nonsense. Watch things open up very quickly in coming weeks regardless of who wins todays election. Its 100% politics. So why not wade in and get vocal if you're village and getting shafted probably more than almost any other publicly listed company?

How so? They decided to wade into state politics during an election in a very vocal way thats definitely rubbing people in the wrong way. But why is that management in a nutshell? Aside from covid related border restrictions, what other management decisions recently are the same as this?

I don’t think anyones disputing that its a marine park in the vein of the US Seaworlds. Its whether it is a theme park. And the answer is absolutely yes. Themed areas and rides have been integral to SW for 30+ years. They’ve continued to add new themed rides every few years. Also should point out VRT only really started calling it a marine park very recently to soften their image after all the animal activist nonsense. That’s just branding and marketing. It’s still a theme park by any reasonable definition.

I quoted multiple posts and it is (was?) a friendly back and forth of different ideas between multiple members but sure, not a debate 🤷‍♂️

Nope. Seaworld started as a ski show and gradually added animals and rides. The heavy reliance on animals only came about in the late 90's. They had heavily themed rides like lassiters (which became Bermuda Triangle) long before there was any conservation message or animals were the main thing. DW and SW are both theme parks that are severely lacking in rides and good theming. But both are theme parks and this is a really stupid debate to be having.

Oh you were just joking when you posted defamation 😃 good one!

So you weren’t banned @Jdude95? No wonder you guys get attacked for your “beliefs” when you just spin any old crap to suit your “dw good village bad” narrative. So there’s not a big depressing wall cutting off a path that used to go to the other half the park there? Like it’spretty amazing that your relying on black and white dictionary definitions to say that’s not a miserable corner of the park. A path that once went somewhere now no longer does. It’s a dead end. And the wall literally connectors to BRC

Didn’t Bikash ban you? I never said you said it so why do you keep asking me to prove it. I like that the victim complex switches from “I” to “we” at the end there. If “we get attacked” then maybe also take responsibility for the anti village stuff that “we” keep posting? Dude there’s a 10ft wall across the path next to BRC that cuts dreamworld in half. That’s not a dead end?