Not necessarily, Helix is quite compact

15 minutes ago, Ryande16 said:

Well based on Macks previous rides they tend to use a large amount of space, to keep the ride open with long drawn out elements unlike that of green lantren and smiler at alton towers. 

Drawn out?

6 minutes ago, Santa07 said:

Not necessarily, Helix is quite compact

Still quite spread out

It's long in length but in width the track is very closely-spaced... now what does that remind you of?  

1 minute ago, Santa07 said:

It's long in length but in width the track is very closely-spaced... now what does that remind you of?  

Flash??

...

Nope

Maybe a bit more local

Take a look at some of the nearmap images posted recently around these forums and you'll understand

10 minutes ago, Gazza said:

Drawn out?

 Nice try @Gazza ? ? 

5 minutes ago, Santa07 said:

...

Nope

Maybe a bit more local

Take a look at some of the nearmap images posted recently around these forums and you'll understand

Green lantern? Tot?

The plot of land for next year's coaster... *sigh*

Look how long and narrow it is

 

9 minutes ago, Santa07 said:

...

Nope

Maybe a bit more local

Take a look at some of the nearmap images posted recently around these forums and you'll understand

Don't tell me your talking about TOT. I doubt MW would spend money on something like that.

Quote

Nice try @Gazza ? ? 

How do you mean? Lost Gravity and Smiler are basically identical in terms of how tight the elements are.

I mean, it doesn't have as many inversions, but its still a tight ride....Look at that airtime hill for example.

 

Edited October 24, 20169 yr by Gazza

1 minute ago, Tim Dasco said:

 

Don't tell me your talking about TOT. I doubt MW would spend money on something like that.

Nah I was referring to land not an existing coaster, sorry if I was hard to understand

1 minute ago, Santa07 said:

Nah I was referring to land not an existing coaster, sorry if I was hard to understand

I think I speak for everyone when I say stop talking in damn riddles.

4 minutes ago, Gazza said:

How do you mean? Lost Gravity and Smiler are basically identical in terms of how tight the elements are.

I mean, it doesn't have as many inversions, but its still a tight ride....Look at that airtime hill for example.

 

Wait is that mack manufactured ride?

8 minutes ago, Santa07 said:

The plot of land for next year's coaster... *sigh*

Look how long and narrow it is

Ohhhhhhhh my bad. ?? 

Yeah suited perfectly for a hyper 

Yes Lost Gravity is a new Mack Big Dipper prototype

Quote

Wait is that mack manufactured ride?

Sure is.

Edited October 24, 20169 yr by Zanstabar

I got it confused with smiler for some reason sorry guys

17 minutes ago, Ryande16 said:

I got it confused with smiler for some reason sorry guys

Smiler doesn't have any yellow striped track.

7 minutes ago, Gazza said:

Smiler doesn't have any yellow striped track.

I thought it did ??

4 hours ago, Gazza said:

I think I speak for everyone when I say stop talking in damn riddles.

Hmmm, is there a hint in that?  Looks like my guess may be wrong.

No, no secret intent there.

I just wish people would say what they mean exactly.

I want a B&M Wing coaster like at Dollyworld.

1 hour ago, POP said:

I want a B&M Wing coaster like at Dollyworld.

This week, on 'Things That Aren't Happening'... 

I wouldn't be hugely surprised if Movieworld partnered with Mack to announce it at IAAPA. If you remember the year S&S built Green Lantern they had the car at the show as part of their exhibit, so clearly Movieworld aren't opposed to such things.

6 hours ago, POP said:

I want a B&M Wing coaster like at Dollyworld.

Want want doesn't get, buddy.

7 hours ago, POP said:

I want a B&M Wing coaster like at Dollyworld.

I'm sure the park after reading your post call up Mack and say "Hey guys can you take your parts back?" and then call up B&M and get them to make a wing coaster.

Except then it probably won't have the "world's best" tag associated with it, because although wing coasters are okay, I'm pretty sure a Mack launch or Hyper would be a lot better.