Leaderboard

Don't be confused Gazza. It is really true. Mack are refurbishing both rides so that they use the ONE pumping system, even though both rides are a significant distance from each other. You have to trust me on this. Its completely true. I cannot remember my exact source but I think it was my cousin's best friend's girlfriends sister's boyfriend who told me on Facebook. I also saw a sign on Thunder Rapids that pointed towards Log Ride that said" Water this way." So you see its completely kosher...I KNOW!! I do not make things up!! My sources are impeccable!! Completely reliable!! Besides..I will never admit I am wrong....I am completely sure of my own guesswork!! and so should you!!! Whatever you do...don't listen to the Dippin Dots guy..he has not got a clue!!!!

Amazing that this conclusion can be drawn from a poster that was done in photoshop.

^ Movieworld

Wow ! 500 million bucks is more than 5 times the original building cost of any one of our big GC parks?!?! Seriously what a ludicrously shit idea and how very Clive Palmer

Nope, was a Dragon after all: http://www.dreamworld.com.au/Attractions/Kung-Fu-Panda-Land-Of-Awesomeness/Awesomeness.aspx http://cdn.parkz.com.au/photo_update/general/2012/12/1219-1_SkaDoosh_LA25.jpg Note the scales and the little coiled up dragon tail at the back, That said, there are lions in the are for all those lion enthusiasts: http://cdn.parkz.com.au/photo_update/general/2012/12/1219-1_Kung_Fu_Panda_L_LA2.jpg

Interesting how do you come to the conclusion that the LTRR show building will be used only for a future minor attraction? Personally I could not DISAGREE more! The show building already has the necessary infrastructure to house a big new ride with power, generators, exhaust fans, air conditioning, pumps etc already there - not to mention a gigantic space that could easily accommodate a rollercoaster or new water ride without having to change much else to the outer structure. Putting a minor attraction inside this building would be a total waste of land resources, which we all know with MW has little of right now. I believe The LTRR will remain dormant for some time yet to come, perhaps with a major new family thrill ride going in some time in 2014..

I agree. And the logo looks great. They should just stick with it

Three? with the river involved, i am starting to think it may be some type of Jungle Cruise? However it seems incredibly dangerous with crocs so it's probably not, it looks exciting though and I certainly wasn't expecting another announcement, I hope they announce the replacement for LTRR next...

Movie World has turned more towards DC as an influence recently. Not saying a Looney Tunes attraction is impossible, but if it is to be a kids attraction, it should be something that is current. While the comics are outdated as well, the new movies are made with the same recognisable characters, characters that the children will relate with, even if they are too young to have seen the movies, there is a whole market for selling related products to kids who are too young to watch the movie. No matter how nostalgic a Looney Tunes Attraction would be, the only reason for building one is to fit with the theme of the area. MW is more likely to theme it to something modern, that the general audience (in this case kids) will relate with. I wonder if kids these days would know who Pepe le Pew is?