It appears  (according to the Experience Oz site) it closed 18th April. 

Just been past MW and the carpark was still full with a lot of the coasters still going. Does this mean MW were smart and kept the park open later because it was 

Either that or people had entered the lines for rides prior to 5:00PM and they were still cycling through.

Great new TopGolf ongoing offer for those that want some weekday morning golf. 

 

Quote

 

$15 Unlimited Play

Visit Topgolf from Monday - Friday between 9AM and midday and enjoy unlimited game play for just $15 per person! It's the perfect way to enjoy a weekday morning at Topgolf.

* Cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer, discount, event or party. Must purchase by 11:15 a.m. Bay time will end at 12 p.m. Any time extension beyond 12 p.m. will be at venue hourly rate. $5 Lifetime Membership fee applies for first time visitors.

 

 

Edited April 26, 20196 yr by Jordan M.

I doubt they would still be cycling through the queues for 50 minutes and have the carpark still completely full.

If they weren’t open late for the QLD holidays I’d doubt they’d be open late when school has gone back already. 

It’s either queue hold over due to being busy during the day, or a corporate/private park booking 

Anyone want to tell me if this is legal?

https://www.facebook.com/(null)?metadata=A6SCxYd9H6ee5/+LsRPXhYM6plpZ9qMC9R7h6ROuBBE6BBFuODKLtYvIHW+/nAv2SyqYHy0k1n4eSFBg7x3ka89RZhPAUcmj&sfns=mo

Page Not Found - which is legal. 

Updated link - https://amusementtradingco.com/new-product-announcement/dreamworld-wipes-out-classic-attraction/

22 minutes ago, Gold Coast Amusement Force said:

Updated link - https://amusementtradingco.com/new-product-announcement/dreamworld-wipes-out-classic-attraction/

If they were recreating the old Wipeout logo purely for fun / social purposes, it wouldn't be technically legal but I doubt Dreamworld would be all that bothered.

If they're using it on items they're selling, that's a different matter! Unless they have permission from Dreamworld, they could very well find themselves in significant legal difficulties!

Yes their designs would be an infringement due to the natural and immediate placement of copyright positions when a design or drawing is created. Whether this would be taken further however, that's a different matter.

I think the merch looks awesome and it’s a shame the park never did something like it (unless they did and I don’t remember), would certainly be cool to do the dates for open and close 

The closing date isn’t correct but cool nevertheless. Here is wipeouts trademark for anyone interested. https://search.ipaustralia.gov.au/trademarks/mobile/view/609333

Whilst against Copyright I doubt (and hope) Dreamworld will take issue with it. 

Edited April 28, 20196 yr by Jordan M.

12 minutes ago, Jordan M. said:

Whilst against Copyright I doubt (and hope) Dreamworld will take issue with it. 

I imagine Dreamworld would never find out about it considering the product is pretty much completely unknown to the public and only had exposure from pcl sharing it, they have now removed the post. Don’t think Dreamworld want to be in court rooms anymore nevertheless...

I’d say they will know about it because as you said PCL has shared it and it’s been shared on these forums too

4 minutes ago, themagician said:

I’d say they will know about it because as you said PCL has shared it and it’s been shared on these forums too

Pcl have already deleted it and I doubt Dreamworld would check pcl.

As has been mentioned many times before the parks do actually monitor these forums from time to time. As I mentioned in my first post I doubt they will take action.

22 minutes ago, Jordan M. said:

As has been mentioned many times before the parks do actually monitor these forums from time to time. As I mentioned in my first post I doubt they will take action.

Yeah what’s that have to do with pcl?

Does copyright law in australia require you to maintain your ownership of it? As in, you have to actively protect the use of the copyright or it sets a precedent and i think ownership can be challenged under the guise of the ownership has been abandoned (if its not being challenged)?

On 28/04/2019 at 10:10 PM, Levithian said:

Does copyright law in australia require you to maintain your ownership of it? As in, you have to actively protect the use of the copyright or it sets a precedent and i think ownership can be challenged under the guise of the ownership has been abandoned (if its not being challenged)?

No. Copyright remains including Prior Use rights. Only trademarks, patents etc require ongoing fees to maintain ownership within lodged Trademark Classes. Unless these guys have written rights from Dreamworld to sell their merch alongside key words like "Dreamworld" "Wipeout" etc it would only cost a few hundred bucks for Dreamworld to send a Cease & Desist letter to shut it down. No small operator will ignore or even consider fighting a Cease & Desist letter and a clear case of copyright infringement.

Village has been particularly quiet recently

 

1 hour ago, themagician said:

Who cares about SV still not going now because this will defiantly make me return.

Finally Dreamworld reveal their business plan. Rducing our Carbon Footprint. Less rides in park, staggered ride times, Lots of shaded seating and everything sustainable. Coming soon pedal powered pumps in Whitewater world. 

37 minutes ago, AdrianHallam said:

Coming soon pedal powered pumps in Whitewater world. 

Mate the off-show Tigers have been running on treadmills to power those pumps for years...