Jump to content

Sea World's Sea Viper closes after 32 years

Featured Replies

  • Replies 382
  • Views 70.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Is there a recent nearmap image that shows the reclaimed land? Perhaps someone can liquid paper the Sea Viper area so we can visualise the entire available land? Oh and Corkscrew died to me when

  • DaptoFunlandGuy
    DaptoFunlandGuy

    *puts popcorn away*

  • It was very heavily rumored back when the ride closed earlier in the year. A sad day, but I think we all saw it coming. Personally, I'm looking forward to the future; with Wild looking less and less

Posted Images

^That's an interesting view Pushbutton (and one I think you've shared before...) however before we go into the details as to why you think flats belong in a fair ground - can you define what you consider to be a 'flat' ride?

The only reason I ask is that all of our parks have several 'flat' rides, so I just want to make sure what we consider 'flat' are the same thing...?

Is that third picture on the pathway between the Lighthouse and Beach Break Bay?

Yes it is

In my opinion, I think we are going to see some major works happening for the Creatures of the Deep attraction after the Summer holidays. I think that like Dinosaur Island, it will use the lighthouse area and that building.

On the theme park place's latest park update, they stated that they believe that now the top section of the bridge (next to jet rescue) has been removed, it could be the entrance to Wild. To me this makes sense, if it is still happening. And if it isn't, it could still make a good entrance.

Edited by themagician

Well no there is no definitive proof that it is dead and buried. The (limited) advertising was pulled - this could mean that it was delayed, which the activity on the reclaimed land would mean a likely 2016 opening instead of the advertised 2015, or it was in fact cancelled.

Pumped dirt....this concerns me...I work in the development industry, I am no expert on this but often dirt that is pumped is a special formula of fertiliser, paper (moistened) and grass seed. It is a quick way to encourage grass to grow without the expense of laying large tracts of turf. The moisture in the paper mixed with seed and fertiliser allows grass to quickly grow up, if the conditions are right and it takes root then great...if it dies then no big deal it is relatively inexpensive.... The thin layer of soil is a tell tail sign...

Grass is also a great way to stabilise soil (such as sand) and is used on large land subdivisions to prevent loose soils washing away.... They may be thinking of a long term solution...a grass paddock....

Hopefully this is wrong....

This may just be a technique to further stabilise the soil - as you say the grass assists that process. At least turfed area will be better than barren hot sand - the grassy areas will be usable space once more, and later it can be developed further.


Space is at a premium at Sea World. They won't leave such a large tract of land vacant for long.

I doubt it - clearly DW has been focussing on Ocean Parade for a long time, and they've started now working on Goldrush area. There is still a lot of space left at DW. Tearing down Eureka is a big operation - given it's shared wall with the cinema, and it's proximity to the rapids.

Plus this is VRTP we're talking about, not Ardent Leisure.

One would think that if it was going to be anything really exciting, they wouldn't be keeping it secret. Quite the opposite!

The fact that nothing in particular is being openly advertised at this stage leads me to think that it won't be anything very exciting at this stage. I hope I'm wrong about that though.

Or, perhaps they realised that revealing their plans openly too far in advance means they look stupid when the plans fall through, so therefore - they are keeping it secret until closer to construction so as not to keep continuously raising and then dashing hopes of fanboys everywhere.

The last thing I'd want to see at Sea World is a flat ride. In my opinion, they are for fairgrounds, not theme parks.

IMHO this park is screaming for one or 2 quality flat rides. SeaWorld needs to restore the balance somewhat in their ride to attraction ratio. They now have lost over the years 3 rides ( Thrillseeker, Pirate Ship and SeaViper) without any direct replacement.

And also sorry I have to disagree- flats are essential in any theme park to flesh out and bring diversity to the attraction offering. They definitely belong in Theme Parks. Just look at the numerous examples of well themed flats in some of the best theme parks in the business- including Disneyland.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.