Leaderboard

That's ok mate. It doesn't matter if you get things wrong, what's important is that when you realise it's wrong, acknowledge the mistake and move on, rather than continuing to fruitlessly argue the point, or deleting the replies of those who proved it to you.

Building a coaster doesn't exclude people who don't want to ride it, all the other attractions are still there. You can build as many indoor family attractions as you like, but nothing will bring in the crowds like a massive roller coaster. People who want to ride it will drag along their family and friends for a day at the park, and these people will still go even if they don't particularly want to ride the thrill rides. The people who do ride it will go back to school and work and tell all of their acquaintances about it, and those who want to ride it will drag their friends and family to the park. I don't understand how people can actually be against more coasters, they're undoubtedly the biggest players in the theme park industry, they advertise themselves rather than the parks having to talk them up and advertise them. Maybe I should start complaining every time the parks announce a kiddie ride because I want more money spent on coasters.

Looks defective - I'd take it back and get one that is the right way up...

Glad I could give you a laugh @Theme Park Girl ? Also don't forget that this year, Theme Parks a Go-Go is celebrating 5 years of being for sale.

update on Taz Bumper Cars also off topic- what do you guys think of the new name?

Justice League? Roxy? I've already agreed with the gap hence suggesting other "bigger but still children's" rides be installed in other areas. The park may not be critical, but they are fast running out of usable space for certain attraction types and i'm pretty sure thats been discussed, debated, and agreed to death on here previously. Children's area has just opened some space out the back with cars, yosemite, marvin area all derelict and defunct, and they could fill it, and SHOULD fill it, but given the recent cars build, it isn't 'due'. Re: replacement - also has been discussed and debated to death. I get what you're saying. Actually - I got what you were saying. I'm not saying your choice of words is WRONG, I just don't see it that way myself. That's why I took such pains to say that I appreciated your choice of words, but disagreed. I don't propose to derail any further so won't reply in shit and just maybe leave it at that and agree to disagree on the definition.

I had no choice of words for you because I was not talking to you. MW has not reached critical mass. Looney Tunes River Ride was removed and a new ride installed in the same shed. "Replacement" happened and it’s real. If they build a new ride in the other half of the shed then that would be 1 added ride. I’m not going to derail a whole topic to continue a discussion on the meaning of "replacement". If you want to talk further about the meaning of "replacement" then bring it up in “Let’s talk shit”. There is an age bracket that MW do not cater for. Once you are no longer a youngling but not quite ready for tummy turning rides then what have you got to go on?

I don't think they need to move the area, and they wouldn't, because of the costs of doing that. But I think having a show would be great in the area. I do think they could move the wall back where the Marvin ride was, and install a similar stage and seating setup to the Dora show at SW.

@themagician

having a look at the vehicles on site right now, it looks it's a company called Main Construction based in Loganholme @skeetafly a few men just entered the Show Stage no movement at the Dodgems or WWF as of right now @themagician as I have said no movement on WWF, just a bunch of cars parked on the site at the moment, I did see crane when I was walking past Scooby

i saw them - i'd thought they'd be covers for the gearboxes \ gears visible at the pivot.

If we see you, that tells me that you won't be a very good Ninja.

Just thought I'd drop this here;

Sincerely hoping none of our current parks go that way. But yes - being a Victorian, I have fond memories of Wobbie's World, and also of Wonderland Sydney. I feel out current major parks are in good standing at the moment - so hopefully they won't be lost in the near distant future.

I think SW does need a rollercoaster, and we think MW is getting one next year. I do agree that DW does need a major new coaster though.

Is.....is that a body?

Shouldn't they be going on rides instead?

I'll go for a peak next time I'm at movieworld, but I'm sure it won't be anything too interesting this early.

Launched Freefall 1 is to cheap - Said no one ever RCT3 Park Inspector

I'm honestly surprised no one has taken you up on your offer yet @joz @Clayton, you seem to be experienced at buying likes on Facebook, have you considered buying Theme Parks a Go-Go?

1st GL and now this ima be terrified to even go near a coaster soon