Themepark Enthusist Posted September 6 Report Share Posted September 6 There is no way that would add as much to the expenditure adding a tunnel then the 50mill already spent... Even if it was cheap just something other then shed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaptoFunlandGuy Posted September 7 Report Share Posted September 7 On 06/09/2024 at 2:46 PM, Gazza said: Thats where you can do what Disney (Or Plopsaland as i discovered last week ) does and have themed tunnels with dioramas or whatever. You don't need a tunnel or diorama either.... just saying... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themagician Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 In Jaggs Journeys latest video, it shows that (unfortunately) the corrugated panels is visible on the front of the temple. Obviously final judgment will be reserved until complete, but based on its current state it is a shame that the temple theming doesn’t continue a little further down the side so it’s less obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 Is that the "front" of the temple? it looks like more like the side view you get from the back of the park. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 Looks like the only consideration taken, was the front view. The temple had an opportunity to be an icon of the park. 😫 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 Lol it's not finished yet. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryHeHe8 Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 36 minutes ago, Gazza said: Lol it's not finished yet. That's true, and I feel like a few of us (me included), are forgetting that. I highly doubt that Dreamworld would let this fail. They wouldn't invest 50 million dollars for a mediocre ride, even if the theming is amazing at the front. There's always a chance they could paint a pattern on or blend it somehow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themepark Enthusist Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 1 hour ago, New display name said: Looks like the only consideration taken, was the front view. The temple had an opportunity to be an icon of the park. 😫 Considering that it is the same with the harry potter ride in USJ... It's probably not the worst thing ever. From a side on approach and even in the queueline you can see the white shed/show building the ride is inside of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 1 hour ago, Gazza said: Lol it's not finished yet. That's why I said, looks like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBoy Posted September 8 Report Share Posted September 8 1 hour ago, Themepark Enthusist said: Considering that it is the same with the harry potter ride in USJ... It's probably not the worst thing ever. From a side on approach and even in the queueline you can see the white shed/show building the ride is inside of. And at least they have made the shed green which blends in with the trees behind it (cough cough Village). Its not the best, but its better than a white shed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 For me, white sheds at Movie World are fine. Even though MW have forgotten their roots, the white sheds represent a movie studio. When MW first opened, it was all about showing you the goings at a movie studio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricoart Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) 46 minutes ago, New display name said: For me, white sheds at Movie World are fine. Even though MW have forgotten their roots, the white sheds represent a movie studio. When MW first opened, it was all about showing you the goings at a movie studio. When Dreamworld first opened, it was all about being Australia's Disneyland. Does that make green sheds fine too? Point being, even the most themed parks have some green sheds. It's all about catering to sightlines, and if the sightline that matters looks as good as it's shaping up to be, green walls elsewhere are excusable. Edited September 9 by Tricoart 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 @Tricoartjust shows Disney needs to lift its game. Life isn't, it's ok because Disney does it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricoart Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) 5 minutes ago, New display name said: @Tricoartjust shows Disney needs to lift its game. Life isn't, it's ok because Disney does it. Of course it's not, but if Village using obnoxious sheds is excusable because it kinda matches what Movie World used to be, Dreamworld using green paint instead of detailed facades on the less important sightlines should be given at least that same treatment. Edited September 9 by Tricoart 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaptoFunlandGuy Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 4 minutes ago, New display name said: Life isn't, it's ok because Disney does it. I mean it kinda is. Ignoring Universal for a moment, who fit the similar 'movie park stage' exclusion you've offered up for Movie World - Disney's standards are the supposed benchmark for a fully themed, immersive theme park. And even they don't build themed facades around everything you can see from literally every angle in the park. Sometimes they paint it go away green, and call it a day. And that's ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 I was talking about 2 different things @Tricoart 1. White sheds ok at MW because of the movie studio theme. 2. MW have drifted from,you're at a studio. I want MW to go back to the studio days, so I'm not excusing MW for the white sheds. 2 minutes ago, DaptoFunlandGuy said: I mean it kinda is. Ignoring Universal for a moment, who fit the similar 'movie park stage' exclusion you've offered up for Movie World - Disney's standards are the supposed benchmark for a fully themed, immersive theme park. And even they don't build themed facades around everything you can see from literally every angle in the park. Sometimes they paint it go away green, and call it a day. And that's ok. When I go to a park, I want it to be different from Disney or I might as well just go to Disney. My next trip in November, I'm purposely avoiding Disney and Universal. My theory is if you can't compete with Disney, don't try to emulate Disney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaptoFunlandGuy Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 22 minutes ago, New display name said: When I go to a park, I want it to be different from Disney or I might as well just go to Disney. My next trip in November, I'm purposely avoiding Disney and Universal. My theory is if you can't compete with Disney, don't try to emulate Disney. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) 29 minutes ago, New display name said: I was talking about 2 different things @Tricoart 1. White sheds ok at MW because of the movie studio theme. What about SWs show buildings? Edited September 9 by Gazza 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Gazza said: What about SWs show buildings? Show buildings - Not my favourite. but worst ⬇️ Leviathan - Going to all the effort and you end up with this. = Lazy. Sucks more than The Great Green Shed of DW. @DaptoFunlandGuythank god you went to pictures. The ride layout looks fun @DaptoFunlandGuy Maybe DW had me too hyped on how immersive this area is going to be, and I don't find seeing a shed too immersive. Their words not mine. Edited September 9 by New display name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tricoart Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) May well just be me, but I do kinda like bare buildings in places where sightlines don't matter as much. It's like going to a lower budget zoo, or having views of backstage areas at both zoos and amusement parks, where you're able to appreciate the theming or 'beautification' in places it matters (like the Rivertown-facing facade, or the fake plant walls that obscure Leviathan), whilst being able to see the non-glammed parts when function takes priority over form. It's basic sightlines, but it pleases the part of me that is interested in the systems behind keeping rides operational, and the planning/design that goes into them. Edited September 9 by Tricoart 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 That's good @Tricoart. I want the shed not to bother me. But now, all I see is shed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narra Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 13 minutes ago, Tricoart said: but I do kinda like bare buildings in places where sightlines don't matter as much. Same honestly, why waste hundreds of thousands of dollars on extra themed exterior panels for an angle barely anyone will be able to see from inside the land. We also don't know if they have any plans for something back there that the train might be able to see. Maybe they can put a glass viewing window into the Tiger enclosure? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 (edited) It's all good people, I've ordered a new hat for when I visit DW. Edited September 9 by New display name 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaptoFunlandGuy Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 1 hour ago, New display name said: This one irks me a lot - the final brake run could have benefitted from some love here for dual purpose - it would hide the maintenance building, but it can also potentially shelter the train on the brake run instead of baking riders in the sun if the train is stalled here for any reason. Given the fake greenery they've used elsewhere, a 'tunnel' of this greenery would be perfect here to hide the building, and make it look like you are diving back into the leviathan's lair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New display name Posted September 9 Report Share Posted September 9 It makes no sense. SW put fake greenery past the shed. It's like they had the stuff, but they didn't know where to stick it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.